Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2014, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 81 - 86, 17.07.2014

Muhammed Uçar Mehmet Bozkır

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to be researched the percentage of accuracy in the illness of fibromyalgia syndrome which is only diagnosed with the data of sympathetic skin responses. In the scope of this purpose, the data of sympathetic skin responses which are taken from diagnosed fibromyalgia patients and healthy individuals are analysed and it reveals the percentage of accuracy by using matlab software. In this paper, besides our study, it is also informed about a brief study of literature review on sympathetic skin responses and fibromyalgia syndrome.

Keywords

fibromiyalgi asyndrome sympathetic skin response fibromiyalgia diagnosis artificial neural networks.

References

  • (REFERENCES) Shahani BT, Halperin JJ, Boulu Ph, Cohen J. Sympathetic skin response – a method of assessing unmyelinated axon dysfunction in peripheral neuropaties. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 536-542.
  • Kucera P, Goldenberg Z, kurca E. Sympathetic skin response: review of the method and its clinical use. Bratisl Lek Listy 2004; 105 (3): 108
  • Knezevic W, Bajada S. Peripheral autonomic surface potential: a quantitative technique for recording sympathetic conduction in man. J Neurol Sci 1985; 67: 239-251.
  • Verghese A. Some observations on psychogalvanic reflex. Brij J Psychiat 1968; 114: 639-6
  • Christie MJ. Elekctrodermal activity in the 1980s: a review. J Roy Soc Med 1981; 74; 616-622.
  • Lader MH, Montagu JD. The psychogalvanic reflex: a pharmacologic study of peripheral machanism. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1962; 25: 126-133.
  • Eisenstein EM, Eisenstein D, Bonheim P, Welch EA. Habituation of galvanik skin response in adult males as function of age. Physiol Bchav 1990; 48: 169-173.
  • Ertekin C. Santral ve periferik EMG Otonom sinir sistemi. 2006:884-909
  • Cariga P, Catley M, Mathias CJ, Savic G Frankel HL, Ellaway PH.: Organisation of the Sympathetic Skin Response in Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 72:356-360, 200 Selçuk B, Atlı D, Kurtaran A, İnanır M, Akyüz M.: Serebrovasküler Olay Sonrası Hemipleji Gelişen Hastalarda Sempatik Deri Yanıtları. Türk Fiz. Tıp ve Rehab. Derg., 49(5):18-23, 2003
  • Arunodaya GR, Taly AB.: Sympathetic Skin Response: A Decade Later, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 129: 81-89, 1995
  • Vetrugno R, Liguori R, Cortelli P, Montagna P. Sympathetic skin response: basis mechanisms and clinical applications. Clin Auton Res. 2003; 13:256-270.
  • Shaver BA, Brusilow SW, Cooke RE. Origin of the galvanic skin response. Proc Soc Ex Biol NY 1962; 110: 559–564.
  • Takagi K, Nakayama T. Peripheral effector mechanism of galvanic skin reflex. Jpn J Physiol 1959; 9: 1-7.
  • Roberto Vetrugno, Rocco Liguori, Pietro Cortelli, Pasquale Montagna. Sympathetic skin response. Basic mechanisms and clinical applications. Clin Auton Res 2003; 13 : 256–270.
  • Yokota T, Takahashi T,Kondo M, Fujimori B. Studies on the diphasic wave form of thegalvanic skin reflex. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1959; 11: 687–696.
  • Guida A. A new method of simultaneous recording of two effects of the psychogalvanic reflex (Tarchanoff effect and Fere effect) Riv Patol Clin. 1957 Jun;12(6):303-1
  • Çakır T, Evcik D, Dündar Ü, Yiğit İ, Kavuncu V.: Evaluation of Sympathetic Skin Response and F Wave in Fibromyalgia Syndrome Patient, Turk J Rheumatol 2011;26(1):38-43 doi: 5606/tjr.2011.006.
  • Wolfe, F, Smythe, H.A, Yunus, M.B, The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia, Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee, Arthritis Rheum., 33(2): 160-72, Feb. 2009.
  • Moldofsky H, Scarisbrick P, England R, Smythe H.Musculosketal symptoms and non-REM sleep disturbance in patients with “fibrositis syndrome” and healthy subjects. Psychosom Med 1975;37(4):341-351.
  • McBeth J, Macfarlene GJ, Benjamin S, et al. The assocation between tender points, psychological distress, and adverse childhood experiences. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 1397-1404.
  • Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS, Weinblatt ME; eds. Rheumatology 4th ed. New York Mosby Pr; 2007:701-711.
  • Dönmez A, Erdoğan N. Fibromiyalji Sendromu. Klinik Gelişim 60-64. Özkan Ö, Yildiz M, Köklükaya E, “Fibromiyalji sendromunun teşhisinde kullanılan laboratuar testlerinin sempatik deri cevabı parametreleriyle desteklenerek teşhis doğruluğunun arttırılması”, SAÜ. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 15. Cilt, 1. Sayı, s.17, 20

Fibromiyalji hastalığının sadece sempatik deri yanıtı verileri ile teşhis yüzdeliğinin belirlenmesi

Year 2014, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 81 - 86, 17.07.2014

Muhammed Uçar Mehmet Bozkır

Abstract

Bu çalışmada fibromiyalji sendromu hastalığının sadece sempatik deri yanıtı verileri ile teşhis edilebilme doğruluk
yüzdesinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç kapsamında tanısı konmuş fibromiyalji sendromlu hastalardan ve
sağlıklı bireylerden alınan sempatik deri yanıtı verileri ile matlab yazılımı kullanılarak analiz edilmiş ve doğruluk
yüzdeleri çıkarılmıştır. Makalemizde çalışmamızın yanında sempatik deri yanıtı hakkında kısa bir literatür tarama
çalışmasına ve fibromiyalji sendromu hakkında bilgi verilmiştir.

Keywords

fibromiyalji sendromu sempatik deri direnci fibromiyalji teşhisi yapay sinir ağları

References

  • (REFERENCES) Shahani BT, Halperin JJ, Boulu Ph, Cohen J. Sympathetic skin response – a method of assessing unmyelinated axon dysfunction in peripheral neuropaties. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 536-542.
  • Kucera P, Goldenberg Z, kurca E. Sympathetic skin response: review of the method and its clinical use. Bratisl Lek Listy 2004; 105 (3): 108
  • Knezevic W, Bajada S. Peripheral autonomic surface potential: a quantitative technique for recording sympathetic conduction in man. J Neurol Sci 1985; 67: 239-251.
  • Verghese A. Some observations on psychogalvanic reflex. Brij J Psychiat 1968; 114: 639-6
  • Christie MJ. Elekctrodermal activity in the 1980s: a review. J Roy Soc Med 1981; 74; 616-622.
  • Lader MH, Montagu JD. The psychogalvanic reflex: a pharmacologic study of peripheral machanism. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1962; 25: 126-133.
  • Eisenstein EM, Eisenstein D, Bonheim P, Welch EA. Habituation of galvanik skin response in adult males as function of age. Physiol Bchav 1990; 48: 169-173.
  • Ertekin C. Santral ve periferik EMG Otonom sinir sistemi. 2006:884-909
  • Cariga P, Catley M, Mathias CJ, Savic G Frankel HL, Ellaway PH.: Organisation of the Sympathetic Skin Response in Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 72:356-360, 200 Selçuk B, Atlı D, Kurtaran A, İnanır M, Akyüz M.: Serebrovasküler Olay Sonrası Hemipleji Gelişen Hastalarda Sempatik Deri Yanıtları. Türk Fiz. Tıp ve Rehab. Derg., 49(5):18-23, 2003
  • Arunodaya GR, Taly AB.: Sympathetic Skin Response: A Decade Later, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 129: 81-89, 1995
  • Vetrugno R, Liguori R, Cortelli P, Montagna P. Sympathetic skin response: basis mechanisms and clinical applications. Clin Auton Res. 2003; 13:256-270.
  • Shaver BA, Brusilow SW, Cooke RE. Origin of the galvanic skin response. Proc Soc Ex Biol NY 1962; 110: 559–564.
  • Takagi K, Nakayama T. Peripheral effector mechanism of galvanic skin reflex. Jpn J Physiol 1959; 9: 1-7.
  • Roberto Vetrugno, Rocco Liguori, Pietro Cortelli, Pasquale Montagna. Sympathetic skin response. Basic mechanisms and clinical applications. Clin Auton Res 2003; 13 : 256–270.
  • Yokota T, Takahashi T,Kondo M, Fujimori B. Studies on the diphasic wave form of thegalvanic skin reflex. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1959; 11: 687–696.
  • Guida A. A new method of simultaneous recording of two effects of the psychogalvanic reflex (Tarchanoff effect and Fere effect) Riv Patol Clin. 1957 Jun;12(6):303-1
  • Çakır T, Evcik D, Dündar Ü, Yiğit İ, Kavuncu V.: Evaluation of Sympathetic Skin Response and F Wave in Fibromyalgia Syndrome Patient, Turk J Rheumatol 2011;26(1):38-43 doi: 5606/tjr.2011.006.
  • Wolfe, F, Smythe, H.A, Yunus, M.B, The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia, Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee, Arthritis Rheum., 33(2): 160-72, Feb. 2009.
  • Moldofsky H, Scarisbrick P, England R, Smythe H.Musculosketal symptoms and non-REM sleep disturbance in patients with “fibrositis syndrome” and healthy subjects. Psychosom Med 1975;37(4):341-351.
  • McBeth J, Macfarlene GJ, Benjamin S, et al. The assocation between tender points, psychological distress, and adverse childhood experiences. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 1397-1404.
  • Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS, Weinblatt ME; eds. Rheumatology 4th ed. New York Mosby Pr; 2007:701-711.
  • Dönmez A, Erdoğan N. Fibromiyalji Sendromu. Klinik Gelişim 60-64. Özkan Ö, Yildiz M, Köklükaya E, “Fibromiyalji sendromunun teşhisinde kullanılan laboratuar testlerinin sempatik deri cevabı parametreleriyle desteklenerek teşhis doğruluğunun arttırılması”, SAÜ. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 15. Cilt, 1. Sayı, s.17, 20
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Muhammed Uçar

Mehmet Bozkır This is me

Publication Date July 17, 2014
Submission Date December 19, 2012
Acceptance Date July 27, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 18 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Uçar, M., & Bozkır, M. (2014). Fibromiyalji hastalığının sadece sempatik deri yanıtı verileri ile teşhis yüzdeliğinin belirlenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 18(2), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufbed.54191
AMA Uçar M, Bozkır M. Fibromiyalji hastalığının sadece sempatik deri yanıtı verileri ile teşhis yüzdeliğinin belirlenmesi. SAUJS. July 2014;18(2):81-86. doi:10.16984/saufbed.54191
Chicago Uçar, Muhammed, and Mehmet Bozkır. “Fibromiyalji hastalığının Sadece Sempatik Deri yanıtı Verileri Ile teşhis yüzdeliğinin Belirlenmesi”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 18, no. 2 (July 2014): 81-86. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufbed.54191.
EndNote Uçar M, Bozkır M (July 1, 2014) Fibromiyalji hastalığının sadece sempatik deri yanıtı verileri ile teşhis yüzdeliğinin belirlenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Science 18 2 81–86.
IEEE M. Uçar and M. Bozkır, “Fibromiyalji hastalığının sadece sempatik deri yanıtı verileri ile teşhis yüzdeliğinin belirlenmesi”, SAUJS, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 81–86, 2014, doi: 10.16984/saufbed.54191.
ISNAD Uçar, Muhammed - Bozkır, Mehmet. “Fibromiyalji hastalığının Sadece Sempatik Deri yanıtı Verileri Ile teşhis yüzdeliğinin Belirlenmesi”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 18/2 (July 2014), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufbed.54191.
JAMA Uçar M, Bozkır M. Fibromiyalji hastalığının sadece sempatik deri yanıtı verileri ile teşhis yüzdeliğinin belirlenmesi. SAUJS. 2014;18:81–86.
MLA Uçar, Muhammed and Mehmet Bozkır. “Fibromiyalji hastalığının Sadece Sempatik Deri yanıtı Verileri Ile teşhis yüzdeliğinin Belirlenmesi”. Sakarya University Journal of Science, vol. 18, no. 2, 2014, pp. 81-86, doi:10.16984/saufbed.54191.
Vancouver Uçar M, Bozkır M. Fibromiyalji hastalığının sadece sempatik deri yanıtı verileri ile teşhis yüzdeliğinin belirlenmesi. SAUJS. 2014;18(2):81-6.
 Download Cover Image

30930  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.