Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2019, Volume: 23 Issue: 6, 1207 - 1217, 01.12.2019

Cemal Koçak Mohamedi M. Mjahıdı

Abstract

References

  • [1] D. Johnson, et al., “Mobility support in IPv6,” No. RFC 3775, 2004.
  • [2] C. Perkins, et al., “Mobility support in IPv6,” No. RFC 6275, 2011.
  • [3] A. K. Barbudhe, et al., “Comparison of Mechanisms for Reducing Handover Latency and Packet Loss Problems of Route Optimization in MIPv6,” In Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT). IEEE International Conference on 323-329, 2015.
  • [4] P. A. Shah, et al., “A TOTP-based enhanced route optimization procedure for mobile IPv6 to reduce handover delay and signaling overhead,” The Scientific World Journal, doi:10.1155/2014/506028, 2014.
  • [5] R. Kong, H. Zhou, “Analysis and improvement of Return Routability procedure for network mobility,” In Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, WiCOM 2006. International Conference on 1-4. doi:10.1109/WiCOM.2006.306. 2006.
  • [6] R. Radhakrishnan, et al., “A Robust Return Routability Procedure for Mobile IPv6,” International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security (IJCSNS), 8, 243-240, 2008.
  • [7] A. Z. M. Shahriar, et al., “Route optimization in network mobility: Solutions, classification, comparison, and future research directions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 12(1). doi:10.1109/SURV.2010.020110.00087, 2010.
  • [8] J. Arkko, et al., “Enhanced route optimization for mobile IPv6”, No. RFC 4866, 2007.
  • [9] S. Gupta, S. Gambhir, et al., “An improved architecture for minimizing handover latency in MIPv6,” In Methods and Models in Computer Science (ICM2CS), International Conference on 106-111. doi: 10.1109/ICM2CS.2010.5706728, 2010.
  • [10] M. O. Khan, S. H. Andresen, “Pros and cons of route optimization schemes for network mobility and their implications on handovers,” IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, (6), 622-632, doi: 10.1002/tee.21781, 2012.
  • [11] A. Cabellos-Aparicio, J. Domingo-Pascual, “Mobility Agents: Avoiding the Signaling of Route Optimization on Large Servers,” In Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications PIMRC, IEEE 18th International Symposium on IEEE. pp. 1-5, doi:10.1109/PIMRC.2007.4394606, 2007.
  • [12] D. Le, J. Chang, “Tunneling-based route optimization for mobile IPv6,” In Wireless Communications, Networking and Information Security (WCNIS), IEEE International Conference on 509-513, doi:10.1109/WCINS.2010.5544140, 2010.
  • [13] D. Le, et al., “Evaluation of mobile IPv6 based on an OPNET model,” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists (ICYCS’05), 238-244. 2005.
  • [14] F. A. T. Al-Saedi, M. M. Asem, “Performance Study of Mobile IPv6 Using OPNET,” International Journal of Engineering, 3(8), 549-557, 2014.
  • [15] K. M. Al-Farabi, M. H. Kabir, “Reducing packet loss in Mobile IPv6,” In Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 14th International Conference on IEEE 38-43 doi:10.1109/ICCITechn.2011.6164852, 2011.
  • [16] W. A. A. Alsalihy, M. I. Younis, “Security verification of the return routability protocol by Murphi,” Scientific Research and Essays, 7(21), 986-1996 doi:10.5897/SRE10.1211, 2012.
  • [17] A. Dhraief, A. Belghith, “An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Mobile IPv6 Handover on Transport Protocols,” Smart CR, 2(1), 1-17, doi:10.6029/smartcr.2012.01.001, 2012.
  • [18] A. Encarnacao, G. Bayer, “Mobile IPv6 Binding Update-Return Routability Procedure,” 2008.
  • [19] O. Erunika, et al., “Performance evaluation of host-based mobility management schemes in the internet,” In Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU), Eighth International Conference on IEEE 173-178, doi:10.1109/ICMU.2015.7061062, 2015.

Evaluation of Route Optimization Method in Mobile IPv6 Networks

Year 2019, Volume: 23 Issue: 6, 1207 - 1217, 01.12.2019

Cemal Koçak Mohamedi M. Mjahıdı

Abstract

With Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) protocol support, a host can move from its home
network or one network to another. Tunneling and delay due to rectangular
routing are one of the key factors of optimizing a route from Correspondent
Node (CN) to Mobile Node (MN). However, during handover, packet delivery ratio
due to the mobility of MN should be considered too. This paper investigated
Return Routability Procedure (RRP) as a route optimization method for MIPv6
Networks in terms of Packets Received, Tunneling and Route Optimization Traffic
control received and Overhead. The result showed that video conference received
is the same as if no route optimization method was applied. However, comparing
tunneled control traffics reduced with route optimization control traffic introduced
is negligible. Instead, 0.02% more sum of the tunnel and Route Optimization Overhead
(ROO) were added compared to the sum of tunneled and ROO introduced when no
route optimization method was applied.

Keywords

MIPv6 RRP CN MN Tunneling MIPv6 Routing Optimization

References

  • [1] D. Johnson, et al., “Mobility support in IPv6,” No. RFC 3775, 2004.
  • [2] C. Perkins, et al., “Mobility support in IPv6,” No. RFC 6275, 2011.
  • [3] A. K. Barbudhe, et al., “Comparison of Mechanisms for Reducing Handover Latency and Packet Loss Problems of Route Optimization in MIPv6,” In Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT). IEEE International Conference on 323-329, 2015.
  • [4] P. A. Shah, et al., “A TOTP-based enhanced route optimization procedure for mobile IPv6 to reduce handover delay and signaling overhead,” The Scientific World Journal, doi:10.1155/2014/506028, 2014.
  • [5] R. Kong, H. Zhou, “Analysis and improvement of Return Routability procedure for network mobility,” In Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, WiCOM 2006. International Conference on 1-4. doi:10.1109/WiCOM.2006.306. 2006.
  • [6] R. Radhakrishnan, et al., “A Robust Return Routability Procedure for Mobile IPv6,” International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security (IJCSNS), 8, 243-240, 2008.
  • [7] A. Z. M. Shahriar, et al., “Route optimization in network mobility: Solutions, classification, comparison, and future research directions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 12(1). doi:10.1109/SURV.2010.020110.00087, 2010.
  • [8] J. Arkko, et al., “Enhanced route optimization for mobile IPv6”, No. RFC 4866, 2007.
  • [9] S. Gupta, S. Gambhir, et al., “An improved architecture for minimizing handover latency in MIPv6,” In Methods and Models in Computer Science (ICM2CS), International Conference on 106-111. doi: 10.1109/ICM2CS.2010.5706728, 2010.
  • [10] M. O. Khan, S. H. Andresen, “Pros and cons of route optimization schemes for network mobility and their implications on handovers,” IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, (6), 622-632, doi: 10.1002/tee.21781, 2012.
  • [11] A. Cabellos-Aparicio, J. Domingo-Pascual, “Mobility Agents: Avoiding the Signaling of Route Optimization on Large Servers,” In Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications PIMRC, IEEE 18th International Symposium on IEEE. pp. 1-5, doi:10.1109/PIMRC.2007.4394606, 2007.
  • [12] D. Le, J. Chang, “Tunneling-based route optimization for mobile IPv6,” In Wireless Communications, Networking and Information Security (WCNIS), IEEE International Conference on 509-513, doi:10.1109/WCINS.2010.5544140, 2010.
  • [13] D. Le, et al., “Evaluation of mobile IPv6 based on an OPNET model,” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists (ICYCS’05), 238-244. 2005.
  • [14] F. A. T. Al-Saedi, M. M. Asem, “Performance Study of Mobile IPv6 Using OPNET,” International Journal of Engineering, 3(8), 549-557, 2014.
  • [15] K. M. Al-Farabi, M. H. Kabir, “Reducing packet loss in Mobile IPv6,” In Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 14th International Conference on IEEE 38-43 doi:10.1109/ICCITechn.2011.6164852, 2011.
  • [16] W. A. A. Alsalihy, M. I. Younis, “Security verification of the return routability protocol by Murphi,” Scientific Research and Essays, 7(21), 986-1996 doi:10.5897/SRE10.1211, 2012.
  • [17] A. Dhraief, A. Belghith, “An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Mobile IPv6 Handover on Transport Protocols,” Smart CR, 2(1), 1-17, doi:10.6029/smartcr.2012.01.001, 2012.
  • [18] A. Encarnacao, G. Bayer, “Mobile IPv6 Binding Update-Return Routability Procedure,” 2008.
  • [19] O. Erunika, et al., “Performance evaluation of host-based mobility management schemes in the internet,” In Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU), Eighth International Conference on IEEE 173-178, doi:10.1109/ICMU.2015.7061062, 2015.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Computer Software
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Cemal Koçak 0000-0002-8902-0934

Mohamedi M. Mjahıdı This is me 0000-0002-3962-6997

Publication Date December 1, 2019
Submission Date June 26, 2019
Acceptance Date August 20, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 23 Issue: 6

Cite

APA Koçak, C., & Mjahıdı, M. M. (2019). Evaluation of Route Optimization Method in Mobile IPv6 Networks. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 23(6), 1207-1217.
AMA Koçak C, Mjahıdı MM. Evaluation of Route Optimization Method in Mobile IPv6 Networks. SAUJS. December 2019;23(6):1207-1217.
Chicago Koçak, Cemal, and Mohamedi M. Mjahıdı. “Evaluation of Route Optimization Method in Mobile IPv6 Networks”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 23, no. 6 (December 2019): 1207-17.
EndNote Koçak C, Mjahıdı MM (December 1, 2019) Evaluation of Route Optimization Method in Mobile IPv6 Networks. Sakarya University Journal of Science 23 6 1207–1217.
IEEE C. Koçak and M. M. Mjahıdı, “Evaluation of Route Optimization Method in Mobile IPv6 Networks”, SAUJS, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1207–1217, 2019.
ISNAD Koçak, Cemal - Mjahıdı, Mohamedi M. “Evaluation of Route Optimization Method in Mobile IPv6 Networks”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 23/6 (December 2019), 1207-1217.
JAMA Koçak C, Mjahıdı MM. Evaluation of Route Optimization Method in Mobile IPv6 Networks. SAUJS. 2019;23:1207–1217.
MLA Koçak, Cemal and Mohamedi M. Mjahıdı. “Evaluation of Route Optimization Method in Mobile IPv6 Networks”. Sakarya University Journal of Science, vol. 23, no. 6, 2019, pp. 1207-1.
Vancouver Koçak C, Mjahıdı MM. Evaluation of Route Optimization Method in Mobile IPv6 Networks. SAUJS. 2019;23(6):1207-1.
 Download Cover Image

30930  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.