Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 18 - 25, 30.06.2023

İsmail Ümit Çıkman Mehmet Emin Öncü Şermin Koçyiğit

https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.1187068

Öz

Kaynakça

  • [1] E. Tüzün. Home / living space: post-disaster needs. Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology. Istanbul. 2002. [2] A. Ünal. Reinforcement of reinforced concrete frames not designed according to TDY 2007 with a toothed shear wall. Selcuk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. Konya. 2012. [3] TMMOB Chamber of Geological Engineers (jmo.org.tr)
  • [4] Ulutas H. Comparison of DBYBHY (2007) and TBDY (2018) Earthquake Regulations in terms of Section Damage Limits. European Journal of Science and Technology. vol 17. pp. 351-359. 2019.
  • [5] M. Özkaratay. Evaluation of 6-storey Reinforced Concrete Building with Different Methods in Düzce Earthquake. Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology. Istanbul. 2014.
  • [6] B. Bayraktargil. Principles of Detection of Risky Buildings and Comparison of Turkish Earthquake Code. Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Management. Istanbul. 2015. [7] K. Yeşilkaya. Analysis of reinforced concrete structures determined by rapid observation techniques with the "Detection Principles of Risky Structures 2013" regulation. Master Thesis. Ondokuz Mayıs University, Institute of Science and Technology. Samsun. 2015.
  • [8] M. Olbak. Reusability and Benefits of Risky Buildings with Non-Linear Analysis Methods of Urban Transformation in the Light of Experimental Data. Master Thesis. Istanbul Aydın University Institute of Science and Technology. Istanbul. 2016.
  • [9] S. Altın Karayahshi. Comparison of Existing Building Evaluation and Risky Building Evaluation in Public Buildings. Master Thesis. Celal Bayar University Institute of Science and Technology. Manisa. 2016.
  • [10] Z. Korkmaz. Comparison of the "Japanese Seismic Method" and the "Detection Principles of Risky Structures 2013" Regulation in Determining the Earthquake Performance of Buildings. Master Thesis. Maltepe University Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul. 2017. [11] E. Bahşi. Comparison of Principles Regarding Detection of Risky Buildings and First and Second Stage Evaluation Methods. Master Thesis. Gazi University Institute of Science and Technology, Ankara. 2017.
  • [12] E. Ekinci. Urban Transformation Studies and Cost Analysis for Risky Building Stock in Turkey: A Case Study. Master Thesis. Gazi University Institute of Science and Technology. Ankara. 2018.
  • [13] S. Can. Evaluation of Risky Buildings by Earthquake Safety Screening Method. Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology. Istanbul. 2019.
  • [14] O. Kınaş. Risky Buildings and Urban Transformation Studies, Tunceli Example. Master Thesis. Suleyman Demirel University, Institute of Science and Technology. Sparta. 2019.
  • [15] Hacımustafaoglu. S.F. Altan. M.F. Naim. S. Determination of Risk Situations of Risky Buildings by Observational Analysis. Aurum Journal of Engineering Systems and Architecture. vol. 5.1 pp. 109-118.
  • [16] Gürbüz. A. and Tekin. M. Determination of Regional Earthquake Risk Distribution of Existing Buildings by Performance Ranking Method. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science. vol. 11.1 pp. 37-48. 2015.
  • [17] Işık. E. Calculation of the Performance Score of a Damaged Reinforced Concrete Building. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal. vol. 3, 2, pp. 47-52. 2015.
  • [18] Işık. E. and Dusty. Z. Calculation of Building Performance Score Using Different Variables. Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science. vol. 4.2 pp. 161-172. 2015.

Assessment of Risky Buildings according to the Regulation for Determination of Risky Buildings (RDRB 2019): The Case of Şanlıurfa

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 18 - 25, 30.06.2023

İsmail Ümit Çıkman Mehmet Emin Öncü Şermin Koçyiğit

https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.1187068

Öz

The majority of risky structures in Türkiye’s building stock were constructed before 2000. It has been discovered that buildings constructed before the year 2000 lack engineering services and cannot fulfill the requirements of current regulations. Buildings constructed before 2000 are clearly incapable of providing the required performance and ductility in the event of an earthquake. Therefore, based on the Regulation for Determination of Risky Buildings (RDRB 2019), field studies were conducted on existing buildings built before 2000 in the Siverek district of Şanlıurfa. a two-story reinforced concrete building designed in accordance with field study data was analyzed by following the risk analysis stages for low-rise reinforced concrete buildings in RDRB 2019. An elemental risk analysis was performed on 16 columns, which are vertical elements of the structure, and then a floor-based risk assessment was performed. As a consequence, it was concluded that the building designed in accordance with condition before 2000 was at risk.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Risky buildings Earthquake RDRB

Kaynakça

  • [1] E. Tüzün. Home / living space: post-disaster needs. Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology. Istanbul. 2002. [2] A. Ünal. Reinforcement of reinforced concrete frames not designed according to TDY 2007 with a toothed shear wall. Selcuk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. Konya. 2012. [3] TMMOB Chamber of Geological Engineers (jmo.org.tr)
  • [4] Ulutas H. Comparison of DBYBHY (2007) and TBDY (2018) Earthquake Regulations in terms of Section Damage Limits. European Journal of Science and Technology. vol 17. pp. 351-359. 2019.
  • [5] M. Özkaratay. Evaluation of 6-storey Reinforced Concrete Building with Different Methods in Düzce Earthquake. Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology. Istanbul. 2014.
  • [6] B. Bayraktargil. Principles of Detection of Risky Buildings and Comparison of Turkish Earthquake Code. Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Management. Istanbul. 2015. [7] K. Yeşilkaya. Analysis of reinforced concrete structures determined by rapid observation techniques with the "Detection Principles of Risky Structures 2013" regulation. Master Thesis. Ondokuz Mayıs University, Institute of Science and Technology. Samsun. 2015.
  • [8] M. Olbak. Reusability and Benefits of Risky Buildings with Non-Linear Analysis Methods of Urban Transformation in the Light of Experimental Data. Master Thesis. Istanbul Aydın University Institute of Science and Technology. Istanbul. 2016.
  • [9] S. Altın Karayahshi. Comparison of Existing Building Evaluation and Risky Building Evaluation in Public Buildings. Master Thesis. Celal Bayar University Institute of Science and Technology. Manisa. 2016.
  • [10] Z. Korkmaz. Comparison of the "Japanese Seismic Method" and the "Detection Principles of Risky Structures 2013" Regulation in Determining the Earthquake Performance of Buildings. Master Thesis. Maltepe University Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul. 2017. [11] E. Bahşi. Comparison of Principles Regarding Detection of Risky Buildings and First and Second Stage Evaluation Methods. Master Thesis. Gazi University Institute of Science and Technology, Ankara. 2017.
  • [12] E. Ekinci. Urban Transformation Studies and Cost Analysis for Risky Building Stock in Turkey: A Case Study. Master Thesis. Gazi University Institute of Science and Technology. Ankara. 2018.
  • [13] S. Can. Evaluation of Risky Buildings by Earthquake Safety Screening Method. Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology. Istanbul. 2019.
  • [14] O. Kınaş. Risky Buildings and Urban Transformation Studies, Tunceli Example. Master Thesis. Suleyman Demirel University, Institute of Science and Technology. Sparta. 2019.
  • [15] Hacımustafaoglu. S.F. Altan. M.F. Naim. S. Determination of Risk Situations of Risky Buildings by Observational Analysis. Aurum Journal of Engineering Systems and Architecture. vol. 5.1 pp. 109-118.
  • [16] Gürbüz. A. and Tekin. M. Determination of Regional Earthquake Risk Distribution of Existing Buildings by Performance Ranking Method. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science. vol. 11.1 pp. 37-48. 2015.
  • [17] Işık. E. Calculation of the Performance Score of a Damaged Reinforced Concrete Building. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal. vol. 3, 2, pp. 47-52. 2015.
  • [18] Işık. E. and Dusty. Z. Calculation of Building Performance Score Using Different Variables. Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science. vol. 4.2 pp. 161-172. 2015.
Toplam 14 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İnşaat Mühendisliği
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

İsmail Ümit Çıkman 0000-0003-1738-7152

Mehmet Emin Öncü 0000-0001-6434-293X

Şermin Koçyiğit 0000-0002-7283-8967

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 30 Haziran 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Çıkman, İ. Ü., Öncü, M. E., & Koçyiğit, Ş. (2023). Assessment of Risky Buildings according to the Regulation for Determination of Risky Buildings (RDRB 2019): The Case of Şanlıurfa. European Journal of Technique (EJT), 13(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.1187068
 Kapak Resmi İndir

All articles published by EJT are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.Creative Commons Lisansı