BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2012, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 72 - 85, 27.07.2012

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonom y in Language Learning, Malaysia: Longman , Pearson Education Limited
  • Benson, P. (2006a). Autonom y in language teaching and learning, Language Teaching 40, 21-40 , Cambridge University Press, UK
  • Benson, P. (2006b). Learner autonomy 8: Insider perspectives on autonomy in language teaching and learning, Dublin, Authentik
  • Carr, D. (2008). Learning and virtual worlds. N. Selwyn (Ed.), Education 2.0? Designing the webfor teaching and learning: a commentar y by the technology enhanced learning phase of the teaching and learning research programme (pp. 13-17). Institute of Education, London. (Qevrimici) 15 Temmu z 2011 http://www.tlrp.org/tel/files/2008/11/tel_comm_final.pdf
  • Can, T. (2009). Learning and Teaching Languages Online: A Constructivist Approach. Novitas-ROYAL, 2009, Vol.: 3(1), 60-74.
  • Chang M. M. (2005). Applying Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Web Based Instruction— An Investigation of Motivation Perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning Vol. 18, No. 3, July 2005, pp. 217 - 230
  • Coffman, T. & M. B. Klinger (2008). Utilizing Virtual Worlds in Education: The Implications for Practice. International Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 2 Number 1 s. 29-33
  • Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L. & Molka-Danielsson, J . (2009). Designing Oral Participation in Second Life - A Comparative Study of Two Language Proficiency Courses. ReCALL, 21 (2): s. 206¬ 226. doi:10.1017/S0958344009000196
  • Deutschmann, M. & L. Panichi (2009). Instructional Design, Teacher Practice and Learner Autonomy . In Molka-Danielsen J . & M. Deutschmann Learning and Teaching in the Virtual World of Second Life. Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag, pp. 27-44.
  • Dickinson, L. (1996). Learner Autonony 2: Learner Training for Language Learning, Authentic Language Learning Resources Ltd, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Edirisingha, P. Nie, M., Pluciennik M. & R. Young (2009). Socialisation for learning at a distance in a 3-D multi-user virtual environment. British Journal of Educational Technology Vol 40 No 3 s. 458-47 9
  • EDUCAUSE (2007). The Horizon Report 2007 Edition, Austin, Tx: The New Media Consortium and Boulder, Co: Educause Learning Initiative. (Qevrimici) 12 Temmu z 2011 , http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2007_Horizon_Report.pdf
  • Field, J . (2007). "Looking outwards, not inwards," ELT Journal, Vol. 61 , No. 1, pp. 30-38,
  • Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (1), s. 719 - 740.
  • Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching, UK: Longman
  • Holec, H. (2007). A brief historical perspective on learner and teacher autonomy", "Learner and teacher autonomy : Concepts , realities and responses", T. E. Lamb
  • Holec, H. (1981). Autonom y in Foreign Language Learning", Oxford: Pergamon
  • Hurd, S., Beaven , T. & A. Ortega (2001). Developing Autonom y in Distance Language Learning Context: Issues and Dilemma s for Course Writers. System, 29 s. 341-355
  • Keskitalo, T., Pyykkó, E. & H. Roukamo (2011). Exploring the meaningful Learning of Students in Second Life. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), s.16-26
  • Kluge, S. & L. Riley (2008). Teaching in Virtual Worlds: Opportunities and Chanllanges. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, Volume 5, s. 127-135
  • Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in Use for Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93 Focus Issue, s. 769-782
  • Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik
  • Little, D. (2009). Language learner autonomy and the European Language Portfolio: Two L2 English examples , Language Teaching, 42:2, 222-233 . Cambridge University Press, (Qevrimici) 27 Temmu z 2011 , http://journals.cambridge.org
  • Oxford, R. (2008). Hero with a Thousand Faces : Learner Autonomy , Learning Strategies and Learning Tactics in Independent Language Learning in (Eds) Hurd, S. & Lewis, T. Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings, Multilingual Matters, Bristol, UK, ss. 41-63.
  • Panichi, L., Deutschmann, M. & Molka-Danielsen, J . (2010) "Virtual Worlds for Language Learning and Intercultural Exchange: Is it for Real?", in Guth, S. & Helm F. (2010) (eds.) Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, Literacies and Intercultural Learning in the 21st Century. Peter Lang AG , Bern, pp. 165-195.
  • Peterson, M. (2010). Learner Participation Patterns and Strategy Use in Second Life: an Exploratory Case Study. ReCALL, 22, s. 273-292
  • Salmon, G. (2009). The Future for (Second) Life and Learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, Volume 40, No 3, s. 526-538
  • Sanders R.L. & L. McKeown (2008). Promoting Reflection through Action Learning in a 3D Virtual World. International Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 2 Numbe r 1, s. 50-55
  • Stevens, V. (2006). Second Life in Education and Language Learning. TESL EJ , 10(3). (Qevrimici) 16 Haziran 2011 http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej39/int.html
  • Ushioda, E. (2011). Language learning motivation, self and identity: current theoretical perspectives, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24:3, 199-210
  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  • Warburton, S. (2009). Second Life in higher education: Assessing potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (3), 414-426 .

YABANCI DİL ÖĞRETİMİ BAĞLAMINDA ÖĞRENEN ÖZERKLİĞİNİN SANAL ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARI YOLUYLA DESTEKLENMESİ

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 72 - 85, 27.07.2012

Öz

Eğitim teknolojilerindeki son gelişmeler, yabancı dil öğrenimi ve öğretimi alanında öğrenme özerkliği gibi çağdaş yaklaşımların uygulanmasını gerekli kılmaktadır. Dahası açık ve uzaktan öğretim teknolojilerinin gelişmesiyle de öğrenen özerkliği düşüncesini gerekli kılmaktadır. İnternet ve sanal öğrenme ortamları, öğretmenler, eğitim tasarımcıları ve öğrenciler için yabancı dil öğrenme ve öğretme seçeneklerini çeşitlendirip genişleterek öğrenme olanaklarını değiştirmektedir. Ayrıca, İnternet ve sanal öğrenme ortamları gibi öğrenme ağlarıyla da desteklenen bilgi patlaması öğrencilerin öğrenmesi gereken bilgileri çoğaltmakta ve çeşitlendirmektedir. Bunlar da öğrencilerin özerk bireyler olarak öğrenilecek bilgiler konusunda seçimler yapmasını ve etkin bir biçimde öğrenme konusunda sorumluluk almasını gerektirmektedir. Second Life gibi sanal öğrenme ortamları yabancı dil öğrenme bağlamında birçok yeni olanak sunabilir. Bu çalışma kapsamında “Second Life” adlı sanal dünya platformunun yabancı dil öğrenme sürecinde öğrenen özerkliğini desteklemek için hangi olanakları sunduğu tartışılacaktır.

Kaynakça

  • Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonom y in Language Learning, Malaysia: Longman , Pearson Education Limited
  • Benson, P. (2006a). Autonom y in language teaching and learning, Language Teaching 40, 21-40 , Cambridge University Press, UK
  • Benson, P. (2006b). Learner autonomy 8: Insider perspectives on autonomy in language teaching and learning, Dublin, Authentik
  • Carr, D. (2008). Learning and virtual worlds. N. Selwyn (Ed.), Education 2.0? Designing the webfor teaching and learning: a commentar y by the technology enhanced learning phase of the teaching and learning research programme (pp. 13-17). Institute of Education, London. (Qevrimici) 15 Temmu z 2011 http://www.tlrp.org/tel/files/2008/11/tel_comm_final.pdf
  • Can, T. (2009). Learning and Teaching Languages Online: A Constructivist Approach. Novitas-ROYAL, 2009, Vol.: 3(1), 60-74.
  • Chang M. M. (2005). Applying Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Web Based Instruction— An Investigation of Motivation Perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning Vol. 18, No. 3, July 2005, pp. 217 - 230
  • Coffman, T. & M. B. Klinger (2008). Utilizing Virtual Worlds in Education: The Implications for Practice. International Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 2 Number 1 s. 29-33
  • Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L. & Molka-Danielsson, J . (2009). Designing Oral Participation in Second Life - A Comparative Study of Two Language Proficiency Courses. ReCALL, 21 (2): s. 206¬ 226. doi:10.1017/S0958344009000196
  • Deutschmann, M. & L. Panichi (2009). Instructional Design, Teacher Practice and Learner Autonomy . In Molka-Danielsen J . & M. Deutschmann Learning and Teaching in the Virtual World of Second Life. Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag, pp. 27-44.
  • Dickinson, L. (1996). Learner Autonony 2: Learner Training for Language Learning, Authentic Language Learning Resources Ltd, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Edirisingha, P. Nie, M., Pluciennik M. & R. Young (2009). Socialisation for learning at a distance in a 3-D multi-user virtual environment. British Journal of Educational Technology Vol 40 No 3 s. 458-47 9
  • EDUCAUSE (2007). The Horizon Report 2007 Edition, Austin, Tx: The New Media Consortium and Boulder, Co: Educause Learning Initiative. (Qevrimici) 12 Temmu z 2011 , http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2007_Horizon_Report.pdf
  • Field, J . (2007). "Looking outwards, not inwards," ELT Journal, Vol. 61 , No. 1, pp. 30-38,
  • Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (1), s. 719 - 740.
  • Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching, UK: Longman
  • Holec, H. (2007). A brief historical perspective on learner and teacher autonomy", "Learner and teacher autonomy : Concepts , realities and responses", T. E. Lamb
  • Holec, H. (1981). Autonom y in Foreign Language Learning", Oxford: Pergamon
  • Hurd, S., Beaven , T. & A. Ortega (2001). Developing Autonom y in Distance Language Learning Context: Issues and Dilemma s for Course Writers. System, 29 s. 341-355
  • Keskitalo, T., Pyykkó, E. & H. Roukamo (2011). Exploring the meaningful Learning of Students in Second Life. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), s.16-26
  • Kluge, S. & L. Riley (2008). Teaching in Virtual Worlds: Opportunities and Chanllanges. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, Volume 5, s. 127-135
  • Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in Use for Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93 Focus Issue, s. 769-782
  • Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik
  • Little, D. (2009). Language learner autonomy and the European Language Portfolio: Two L2 English examples , Language Teaching, 42:2, 222-233 . Cambridge University Press, (Qevrimici) 27 Temmu z 2011 , http://journals.cambridge.org
  • Oxford, R. (2008). Hero with a Thousand Faces : Learner Autonomy , Learning Strategies and Learning Tactics in Independent Language Learning in (Eds) Hurd, S. & Lewis, T. Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings, Multilingual Matters, Bristol, UK, ss. 41-63.
  • Panichi, L., Deutschmann, M. & Molka-Danielsen, J . (2010) "Virtual Worlds for Language Learning and Intercultural Exchange: Is it for Real?", in Guth, S. & Helm F. (2010) (eds.) Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, Literacies and Intercultural Learning in the 21st Century. Peter Lang AG , Bern, pp. 165-195.
  • Peterson, M. (2010). Learner Participation Patterns and Strategy Use in Second Life: an Exploratory Case Study. ReCALL, 22, s. 273-292
  • Salmon, G. (2009). The Future for (Second) Life and Learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, Volume 40, No 3, s. 526-538
  • Sanders R.L. & L. McKeown (2008). Promoting Reflection through Action Learning in a 3D Virtual World. International Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 2 Numbe r 1, s. 50-55
  • Stevens, V. (2006). Second Life in Education and Language Learning. TESL EJ , 10(3). (Qevrimici) 16 Haziran 2011 http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej39/int.html
  • Ushioda, E. (2011). Language learning motivation, self and identity: current theoretical perspectives, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24:3, 199-210
  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  • Warburton, S. (2009). Second Life in higher education: Assessing potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (3), 414-426 .
Yıl 2012, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 72 - 85, 27.07.2012

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonom y in Language Learning, Malaysia: Longman , Pearson Education Limited
  • Benson, P. (2006a). Autonom y in language teaching and learning, Language Teaching 40, 21-40 , Cambridge University Press, UK
  • Benson, P. (2006b). Learner autonomy 8: Insider perspectives on autonomy in language teaching and learning, Dublin, Authentik
  • Carr, D. (2008). Learning and virtual worlds. N. Selwyn (Ed.), Education 2.0? Designing the webfor teaching and learning: a commentar y by the technology enhanced learning phase of the teaching and learning research programme (pp. 13-17). Institute of Education, London. (Qevrimici) 15 Temmu z 2011 http://www.tlrp.org/tel/files/2008/11/tel_comm_final.pdf
  • Can, T. (2009). Learning and Teaching Languages Online: A Constructivist Approach. Novitas-ROYAL, 2009, Vol.: 3(1), 60-74.
  • Chang M. M. (2005). Applying Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Web Based Instruction— An Investigation of Motivation Perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning Vol. 18, No. 3, July 2005, pp. 217 - 230
  • Coffman, T. & M. B. Klinger (2008). Utilizing Virtual Worlds in Education: The Implications for Practice. International Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 2 Number 1 s. 29-33
  • Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L. & Molka-Danielsson, J . (2009). Designing Oral Participation in Second Life - A Comparative Study of Two Language Proficiency Courses. ReCALL, 21 (2): s. 206¬ 226. doi:10.1017/S0958344009000196
  • Deutschmann, M. & L. Panichi (2009). Instructional Design, Teacher Practice and Learner Autonomy . In Molka-Danielsen J . & M. Deutschmann Learning and Teaching in the Virtual World of Second Life. Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag, pp. 27-44.
  • Dickinson, L. (1996). Learner Autonony 2: Learner Training for Language Learning, Authentic Language Learning Resources Ltd, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Edirisingha, P. Nie, M., Pluciennik M. & R. Young (2009). Socialisation for learning at a distance in a 3-D multi-user virtual environment. British Journal of Educational Technology Vol 40 No 3 s. 458-47 9
  • EDUCAUSE (2007). The Horizon Report 2007 Edition, Austin, Tx: The New Media Consortium and Boulder, Co: Educause Learning Initiative. (Qevrimici) 12 Temmu z 2011 , http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2007_Horizon_Report.pdf
  • Field, J . (2007). "Looking outwards, not inwards," ELT Journal, Vol. 61 , No. 1, pp. 30-38,
  • Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (1), s. 719 - 740.
  • Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching, UK: Longman
  • Holec, H. (2007). A brief historical perspective on learner and teacher autonomy", "Learner and teacher autonomy : Concepts , realities and responses", T. E. Lamb
  • Holec, H. (1981). Autonom y in Foreign Language Learning", Oxford: Pergamon
  • Hurd, S., Beaven , T. & A. Ortega (2001). Developing Autonom y in Distance Language Learning Context: Issues and Dilemma s for Course Writers. System, 29 s. 341-355
  • Keskitalo, T., Pyykkó, E. & H. Roukamo (2011). Exploring the meaningful Learning of Students in Second Life. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), s.16-26
  • Kluge, S. & L. Riley (2008). Teaching in Virtual Worlds: Opportunities and Chanllanges. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, Volume 5, s. 127-135
  • Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in Use for Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93 Focus Issue, s. 769-782
  • Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik
  • Little, D. (2009). Language learner autonomy and the European Language Portfolio: Two L2 English examples , Language Teaching, 42:2, 222-233 . Cambridge University Press, (Qevrimici) 27 Temmu z 2011 , http://journals.cambridge.org
  • Oxford, R. (2008). Hero with a Thousand Faces : Learner Autonomy , Learning Strategies and Learning Tactics in Independent Language Learning in (Eds) Hurd, S. & Lewis, T. Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings, Multilingual Matters, Bristol, UK, ss. 41-63.
  • Panichi, L., Deutschmann, M. & Molka-Danielsen, J . (2010) "Virtual Worlds for Language Learning and Intercultural Exchange: Is it for Real?", in Guth, S. & Helm F. (2010) (eds.) Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, Literacies and Intercultural Learning in the 21st Century. Peter Lang AG , Bern, pp. 165-195.
  • Peterson, M. (2010). Learner Participation Patterns and Strategy Use in Second Life: an Exploratory Case Study. ReCALL, 22, s. 273-292
  • Salmon, G. (2009). The Future for (Second) Life and Learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, Volume 40, No 3, s. 526-538
  • Sanders R.L. & L. McKeown (2008). Promoting Reflection through Action Learning in a 3D Virtual World. International Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 2 Numbe r 1, s. 50-55
  • Stevens, V. (2006). Second Life in Education and Language Learning. TESL EJ , 10(3). (Qevrimici) 16 Haziran 2011 http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej39/int.html
  • Ushioda, E. (2011). Language learning motivation, self and identity: current theoretical perspectives, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24:3, 199-210
  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  • Warburton, S. (2009). Second Life in higher education: Assessing potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (3), 414-426 .
Toplam 33 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Tuncer Can

Yayımlanma Tarihi 27 Temmuz 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2012 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Can, T. (2012). YABANCI DİL ÖĞRETİMİ BAĞLAMINDA ÖĞRENEN ÖZERKLİĞİNİN SANAL ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARI YOLUYLA DESTEKLENMESİ. HAYEF Journal of Education, 9(1), 72-85.
AMA Can T. YABANCI DİL ÖĞRETİMİ BAĞLAMINDA ÖĞRENEN ÖZERKLİĞİNİN SANAL ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARI YOLUYLA DESTEKLENMESİ. HAYEF Journal of Education. Temmuz 2012;9(1):72-85.
Chicago Can, Tuncer. “YABANCI DİL ÖĞRETİMİ BAĞLAMINDA ÖĞRENEN ÖZERKLİĞİNİN SANAL ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARI YOLUYLA DESTEKLENMESİ”. HAYEF Journal of Education 9, sy. 1 (Temmuz 2012): 72-85.
EndNote Can T (01 Temmuz 2012) YABANCI DİL ÖĞRETİMİ BAĞLAMINDA ÖĞRENEN ÖZERKLİĞİNİN SANAL ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARI YOLUYLA DESTEKLENMESİ. HAYEF Journal of Education 9 1 72–85.
IEEE T. Can, “YABANCI DİL ÖĞRETİMİ BAĞLAMINDA ÖĞRENEN ÖZERKLİĞİNİN SANAL ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARI YOLUYLA DESTEKLENMESİ”, HAYEF Journal of Education, c. 9, sy. 1, ss. 72–85, 2012.
ISNAD Can, Tuncer. “YABANCI DİL ÖĞRETİMİ BAĞLAMINDA ÖĞRENEN ÖZERKLİĞİNİN SANAL ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARI YOLUYLA DESTEKLENMESİ”. HAYEF Journal of Education 9/1 (Temmuz 2012), 72-85.
JAMA Can T. YABANCI DİL ÖĞRETİMİ BAĞLAMINDA ÖĞRENEN ÖZERKLİĞİNİN SANAL ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARI YOLUYLA DESTEKLENMESİ. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2012;9:72–85.
MLA Can, Tuncer. “YABANCI DİL ÖĞRETİMİ BAĞLAMINDA ÖĞRENEN ÖZERKLİĞİNİN SANAL ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARI YOLUYLA DESTEKLENMESİ”. HAYEF Journal of Education, c. 9, sy. 1, 2012, ss. 72-85.
Vancouver Can T. YABANCI DİL ÖĞRETİMİ BAĞLAMINDA ÖĞRENEN ÖZERKLİĞİNİN SANAL ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARI YOLUYLA DESTEKLENMESİ. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2012;9(1):72-85.