Review

From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques

Volume: 9 Number: 1 March 30, 2026

From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques

Abstract

This study explores the current state, core methodologies, and major challenges associated with non-line-of-sight (NLOS) sensing technologies. NLOS sensing enables the detection of objects and individuals outside the direct field of view and has critical applications in disaster response, security, and autonomous systems. Despite its growing potential, the field faces technical limitations, including restricted resolution, complex data processing, and multipath propagation effects. A wide range of approaches is examined, including both active and passive systems, SPAD and CCD/CMOS sensors, confocal and non-confocal imaging techniques, acoustic methods, and artificial intelligence-based models. The study also emphasizes innovative experimental setups and complex scene designs to evaluate system performance under realistic and challenging conditions. Furthermore, diverse evaluation metrics are discussed to support both numerical and perceptual analysis of system outputs. In conclusion, NLOS sensing is a complex field that requires an interdisciplinary approach, but it holds great potential for the scientific community and practitioners due to the opportunities it offers. This study has contributed to the current body of knowledge and provided suggestions that will guide future research.

Keywords

References

  1. A. Kirmani, T. Hutchison, J. Davis, and R. Raskar, “Looking around the corner using transient imaging,” Proc. 2009 IEEE 12th Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., Kyoto, pp. 159–166, 2009. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459160
  2. A. Velten, T. Willwacher, O. Gupta, A. Veeraraghavan, M. G. Bawendi, and R. Raskar, “Recovering three-dimensional shape around a corner using ultrafast time-of-flight imaging,” Nat. Commun., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 745, 2012. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1747
  3. C. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Fang, C. Yan, X. Zhang, and Y. Zuo, “Event-enhanced passive non-line-of-sight imaging for moving objects with physical embedding,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 24, no. 22, pp. 37970–37985, 2024. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3468909
  4. G. Musarra et al., “Non-line-of-sight 3D imaging with a single-pixel camera,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 011002, 2019.
  5. C. Wu et al., “Non–line-of-sight imaging over 1.43 km,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 118, no. 10, p. e2024468118, 2021.
  6. X. Lei et al., “Direct object recognition without line-of-sight using optical coherence,” Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), pp. 11729–11738, 2019. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.01201
  7. M. L. Manna, J.-H. Nam, S. A. Reza, and A. Velten, “Non-line-of-sight imaging using dynamic relay surfaces,” Opt. Express, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 5331–5339, 2020.
  8. J. He, S. Wu, R. Wei, and Y. Zhang, “Non-line-of-sight imaging and tracking of moving objects based on deep learning,” Opt. Express, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 16758–16772, 2022.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Software Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Review

Early Pub Date

March 30, 2026

Publication Date

March 30, 2026

Submission Date

June 13, 2025

Acceptance Date

November 18, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 1

APA
Çelebi, S., & Türkoğlu, İ. (2026). From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 9(1), 262-291. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis...1718848
AMA
1.Çelebi S, Türkoğlu İ. From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques. SAUCIS. 2026;9(1):262-291. doi:10.35377/saucis.1718848
Chicago
Çelebi, Semra, and İbrahim Türkoğlu. 2026. “From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques”. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 9 (1): 262-91. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis. 1718848.
EndNote
Çelebi S, Türkoğlu İ (March 1, 2026) From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 9 1 262–291.
IEEE
[1]S. Çelebi and İ. Türkoğlu, “From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques”, SAUCIS, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 262–291, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.35377/saucis...1718848.
ISNAD
Çelebi, Semra - Türkoğlu, İbrahim. “From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques”. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 9/1 (March 1, 2026): 262-291. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis. 1718848.
JAMA
1.Çelebi S, Türkoğlu İ. From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques. SAUCIS. 2026;9:262–291.
MLA
Çelebi, Semra, and İbrahim Türkoğlu. “From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques”. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, Mar. 2026, pp. 262-91, doi:10.35377/saucis. 1718848.
Vancouver
1.Semra Çelebi, İbrahim Türkoğlu. From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques. SAUCIS. 2026 Mar. 1;9(1):262-91. doi:10.35377/saucis. 1718848

 

INDEXING & ABSTRACTING & ARCHIVING

 

31045 31044   ResimLink - Resim Yükle  31047 

31043 28939 28938 34240
 

 

29070    The papers in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License