Global Trends in Speaker Identification Under Voice Disguise: A 25-Year Review

Mahesh K. Singh; Sanjeev Kumar; Rajeev Ranjan

doi:10.35377/saucis...1754132

Global Trends in Speaker Identification Under Voice Disguise: A 25-Year Review

Abstract

Voice disguise is the technique by which a speaker deliberately changes their voice to conceal their identity. This poses a major challenge in the field of speaker identification. Due to these major challenges, research on disguised voices has significantly increased in security and forensic applications. Disguised voices can be exploited to evade detection in surveillance, verification, and forensic investigations, raising concerns about system reliability, evidence integrity, and overall communication security. The purpose of this study was to investigate the major countries, institutions, famous researchers, collaboration networks, high-impact publications, and key research subjects and trends in the field of speaker identification from disguised voice. This review analysis investigates the present state of speaker identification research on a global scale, with a special emphasis on disguised voice. In proposed research work shown a bibliometric analysis of 3287 manuscripts that were published between the years 2001 and 2025. The study analyses from dimensions AI dataset that covers the years 2001–2025 and uses VOS viewer to show how different countries, institutions, and authors collaborate, cite each other, and produce research in speaker identification from disguised voice. According to the citation analysis for speaker identification from disguised voice, the field is being mounded by seminal works and important researchers. Germany, UK, and US are quickly becoming the world's leading research centers. Increasing global cooperation in speaker identification from disguised voice area has led to clear geographical clustering in collaboration networks, with Europe and Asia being the most prominent. From 2025 to 2040, the forecast model predicts a consistent growth in publication production in speaker identification. As a result, efforts to develop speaker identification systems will likely continue. Citation mapping not only shows the evolution of the research landscape but also the most frequently cited foundational works and high-impact articles. This research work on speaker identification serves as a strategic resource for future research because it not only emphasizes the importance of collaborative research but also highlights influential literature, active nations, and emerging trends. For academics interested in the past, present, and future of speaker identification research from disguised voice in this exciting and rapidly evolving area of technology, this bibliometric analysis will be a priceless resource.

Keywords

References

M. Farrús, “Voice disguise in automatic speaker recognition,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1–22, 2018. doi: 10.1145/3195832
M. K. Singh, “Identification of Speaker from Disguised Voice Using MFCC Feature Extraction, Chi-Square and Classification Technique,” Wireless Pers. Commun, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 973–987, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s11277-024-11542-0
L. Tavi, T. Kinnunen, and R. G. Hautamäki, “Improving speaker de-identification with functional data analysis of f0 trajectories,” Speech Commun, vol. 140, pp. 1–10, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2022.03.010
I. Altalahin, S. AlZu'bi, A. Alqudah, and A. Mughaid, “Unmasking the truth: A deep learning approach to detecting deepfake audio through MFCC features,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Information Technology (ICIT), pp. 511–518, Aug. 2023. doi: 10.1109/ICIT58056.2023.10226172
E. B. Kang, “Biometric imaginaries: Formatting voice, body, identity to data,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 581–602, 2022. doi: 10.1177/03063127221079599
S. Krouwer, K. Poels, and S. Paulussen, “To disguise or to disclose? The influence of disclosure recognition and brand presence on readers' responses toward native advertisements in online news media,” J. Interact. Advert., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 124–137, 2017. doi:10.1080/15252019.2017.1381579
I. Park, and B. Yoon, “Identifying promising research frontiers of pattern recognition through bibliometric analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 4055, 2018. doi: 10.3390/su10114055
J. Chen, and H. Chang, “Sketching the landscape of speech perception research (2000–2020): A bibliometric study,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, p. 822241, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822241

N. Das, and N. Padhy, “A Bibliometric and co-occurrence analysis of speech processing literature published from the year 2015 to mid of June 2021,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Data Sci., Mach. Learn. Artif. Intell., pp. 237–243, 2021. doi: 10.1145/3484824.348490
J. Yin, “Research on the application of visual maps based on CiteSpace in speech technology,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1952, no. 2, p. 022062, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1952/2/022062
L. Wu, and M. Chen, “A Bibliometric Analysis of Intelligent Voice Interaction Based on VOSviewer,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Human-Comput. Interact., pp. 443–455, 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-06018-2_31
C. Puig-Herreros, J. L. Sanz, V. Rosell-Clari, L. Barona, and M. Melo, “What are the contemporary trends on euphonic voice research? A scientometric analysis,” Healthcare, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 2137, 2022. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112137
A. Alduais, M. A. Al-Khulaidi, S. Allegretta, and M. M. Abdulkhalek, “Forensic linguistics: A scientometric review,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 10, no. 1, Art. No. 2214387, 2023. doi: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2214387
M. S. Vitevitch, “Speech, language, and hearing in the 21st century: A bibliometric review of JSLHR from 2001 to 2021,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 3428–3451, 2023. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00203
D. F. Kponou, F. A. Laleye, and E. C. Ezin, “Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of low-resource speech-to-text translation,” in Proc. Future Technologies Conf., Cham: Springer, pp. 379–398, Nov. 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-73125-9_24
M. Wasi, S. Zaki, and R. H. Anwar, “A bibliometric analysis of research in forensic linguistics,” SAGE Open, vol. 14, no. 4, 2024. doi: 10.1177/21582440241299280
M. Yan, and X. Wu, “Prosody in linguistic journals: a bibliometric analysis,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 11, Art. No. 311, pp. 1–15, 2024. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-02825-9
N. Malik, A. Singh, and A. Kumar, “Acoustic signal processing and communications: Topic modeling of scopus abstracts from 2010 till 2024,” in Proc. 27th Int. Symp. Wireless Pers. Multimedia Commun. (WPMC), pp. 1–5, Nov. 2024. doi: 10.1109/WPMC63271.2024.10863719
A. Bolakale Abdul Qudus et al., “A contemporary and comprehensive bibliometric exposition on deepfake research and trends,” Comput. Mater. Continua, vol. 84, no. 1, 2025. doi: 10.32604/cmc.2025.061427
M. Gee-Whai Kho, and S. H. Ting, “Bibliometric analysis of trends in research on communication apprehension,” Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit, vol. 33, no. 2, 2025. doi: 10.47836/pjssh.33.2.02
G. Lemaitre, O. Houix, F. Voisin, N. Misdariis, and P. Susini, “Comparing identification of vocal imitations and computational sketches of everyday sounds,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 140, no. 4, p. 3390, 2016. doi: 10.1121/1.4970854
S. C. Dougherty, D. E. Mclaughlin, and T. K. Perrachione, “A language familiarity effect for talker identification in forward but not time-reversed speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 137, no. 4, p. 2415, 2015, doi: 10.1121/1.4920807
M. Ruble et al., “Hyperdimensional Bayesian time mapping (HYPERBAT): A probabilistic approach to time series mapping of non-identical sequences,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 14, pp. 3719–3731, 2019. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2019.2919002
E. S. Hassan et al., “Enhancing speaker identification through reverberation modeling and cancelable techniques using ANNs,” PLOS ONE, vol. 19, no. 2, p. e0294235, 2024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294235
N. Mamun, R. Ghosh, and J. H. Hansen, “Familiar and unfamiliar speaker recognition assessment and system emulation for cochlear implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 1293–1306, 2023. doi: 10.1121/10.0017216
J. H. Hansen, M. K. Nandwana, and N. Shokouhi, “Analysis of human scream and its impact on text-independent speaker verification,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 2957–2967, 2017. doi: 10.1121/1.4979337
E. Hernández-García et al., “A voice and speech corpus of patients who underwent upper airway surgery in pre-and post-operative states,” Scientific Data, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 746, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03540-5
E. Jacewicz, R. A. Fox, and C. E. Holt, “Dialect and gender perception in relation to the intelligibility of low-pass and high-pass filtered spontaneous speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 154, no. 3, pp. 1667–1683, 2023. doi: 10.1121/10.0020906
Y. Suh, and H. Kim, “Minimum classification error-based weighted support vector machine kernels for speaker verification,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 133, no. 4, pp. EL307–EL313, 2013. doi: 10.1121/1.4794350
I. M. S. Bimantara et al., “Balinese story texts dataset for narrative text analyses,” Data in Brief, vol. 56, p. 110781, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110781
M. Zolnoori et al., “Is the patient speaking or the nurse? Automatic speaker type identification in patient–nurse audio recordings,” J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1673–1683, 2023. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad139
A. B. Nassif, I. Shahin, and N. Nemmour, “Emotional speaker identification using PCAFCM-deepforest with fuzzy logic,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 36, no. 30, pp. 18567–18581, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s00521-024-10154-w
N. M. Almarshady, A. A. Alashban, and Y. A. Alotaibi, “Analysis and investigation of speaker identification problems using deep learning networks and the YOHO English speech dataset,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 17, p. 9567, 2023. doi: 10.3390/app13179567
O. H. Anidjar, R. Marbel, and R. Yozevitch, “Harnessing the power of wav2vec2 and CNNs for robust speaker identification on the VoxCeleb and LibriSpeech datasets,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 255, p. 124671, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124671
H. J. Künzel, “Non-contemporary speech samples: auditory detectability of an 11-year delay and its effect on automatic speaker identification,” Int. J. Speech Lang. Law, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 109–136, 2007. doi: 10.1558/ijsll.v14i1.109
A. A. Moura, N. Nepomuceno, and V. Furtado, “Enhancing speaker identification in criminal investigations through clusterization and rank-based scoring,” Forensic Sci. Int.: Digit. Investig., vol. 49, p. 301765, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301765
M. K. Singh, “Feature extraction and classification efficiency analysis using machine learning approach for speech signal,” Multimedia Tools Appl., vol. 83, no. 16, pp. 47069–47084, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s11042-023-17368-5
P. Aneja, S. K. Choudhary, and S. Mathur, “Aural-acoustic analysis and gender identification of morphed male and female audios,” Int. J. Electron. Secur. Digit. Forensics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 177–183, 2023. doi: 10.1504/IJESDF.2023.129275
K. Daqrouq, “Wavelet entropy and neural network for text-independent speaker identification,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 796–802, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2011.01.001
A. B. Kain et al., “Improving the intelligibility of dysarthric speech,” Speech Commun., vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 743–759, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2007.05.001
S. A. Kumar, and C. S. Kumar, “Improving the intelligibility of dysarthric speech towards enhancing the effectiveness of speech therapy,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Adv. Comput., Commun. Informat. (ICACCI), pp. 1000–1005, Sept. 2016. doi: 10.1109/ICACCI.2016.7732175
M. Newman, and A. Wu, “‘Do you sound Asian when you speak English?’ Racial identification and voice in Chinese and Korean Americans' English,” Amer. Speech, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 152–178, 2011. doi: 10.1215/00031283-1336992
J. H. Hansen, and H. Bořil, “On the issues of intra-speaker variability and realism in speech, speaker, and language recognition tasks,” Speech Commun., vol. 101, pp. 94–108, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2018.05.004
D. Mücke et al., “Challenges with the kinematic analysis of neurotypical and impaired speech: Measures and models,” J. Phonetics, vol. 102, p. 101292, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101292
M. Corrales-Astorgano et al., “Analysis of atypical prosodic patterns in the speech of people with Down syndrome,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 69, p. 102913, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102913
S. G. Lambacher et al., “The effects of identification training on the identification and production of American English vowels by native speakers of Japanese,” Appl. Psycholinguistics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 227–247, 2005. doi: 10.1017/S0142716405050150
M. Cao, P. I. Pavlik Jr, and G. M. Bidelman, “Enhancing lexical tone learning for second language speakers: effects of acoustic properties in Mandarin tone perception,” Front. Psychol., vol. 15, p. 1403816, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403816
G. Zellou, A. Pycha, and M. Cohn, “The perception of nasal coarticulatory variation in face-masked speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 1084–1093, 2023. doi: 10.1121/10.0017257
L. Ménard, P. Trudeau-Fisette, and M. K. Tiede, “Intelligibility of speech produced by sighted and blind adults,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 9, Art. No. e0272127, 2022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272127
K. Bunton, “Fundamental frequency as a perceptual cue for vowel identification in speakers with Parkinson’s disease,” Folia Phoniatr. Logop., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 323–339, 2006. doi: 10.1159/000094567
M. L. Ng, and R. Chu, “An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese,” Folia Phoniatr. Logop, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 2009. doi: 10.1159/000209272
C. Y. Lee et al., “Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 1130–1140, 2012. doi: 10.1121/1.4730883
I. Phillips et al., “Age impacts speech-in-noise recognition differently for nonnative and native listeners,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1602–1623, 2024. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00470
S. R. Cox, L. J. Raphael, and P. C. Doyle, “Production of vowels by electrolaryngeal speakers using clear speech,” Folia Phoniatr. Logop., vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 250–256, 2020. doi: 10.1159/000499928
J. K. Y. Ma, T. L. Whitehill, and S. Y. S. So, “Intonation contrast in Cantonese speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria associated with Parkinson’s disease,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 836–849, 2010. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0216)
V. G. Skuk, and S. R. Schweinberger, “Gender differences in familiar voice identification,” Hearing Res., vol. 296, pp. 131–140, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.11.004
C. Y. Lee, “Identifying isolated, multispeaker Mandarin tones from brief acoustic input: A perceptual and acoustic study,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 1125–1137, 2009. doi: 10.1121/1.3050322
C. Zhang, and J. H. Hansen, “Phonetic variability constrained bottleneck features for joint speaker recognition and physical task stress detection,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 148, no. 5, pp. 2912–2921, 2020. doi: 10.1121/10.0002455
V. Martel-Sauvageau et al., “The impact of clear speech on the perceptual and acoustic properties of fricative–vowel sequences in speakers with dysarthria,” Amer. J. Speech Lang. Pathol., vol. 30, no. 3S, pp. 1410–1428, 2021. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00157
O. Hazrati, H. Ali, J. H. Hansen, and E. Tobey, “Evaluation and analysis of whispered speech for cochlear implant users: Gender identification and intelligibility,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 74–79, 2015. doi: 10.1121/1.4922230
L. Marchegiani and X. Fafoutis, “On cross-language consonant identification in second language noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 138, no. 4, pp. 2206–2209, 2015. doi: 10.1121/1.4930955
S. Singh, S. Kumar, and B. K. Tripathi, “A comprehensive analysis of quaternion deep neural networks: architectures, applications, challenges, and future scope,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., pp. 1–28, 2024. doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10216-1
H. Luo, A. Boemio, M. Gordon, and D. Poeppel, “The perception of FM sweeps by Chinese and English listeners,” Hearing Res., vol. 224, no. 1–2, pp. 75–83, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.11.007
V. Aglieri, B. Cagna, L. Velly, S. Takerkart, and P. Belin, “FMRI-based identity classification accuracy in left temporal and frontal regions predicts speaker recognition performance,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 489, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79922-7
V. Von Kriegstein et al., “How the human brain recognizes speech in the context of changing speakers,” J. Neurosci., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 629–638, 2010. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2742-09.2010
X. Jiang, K. Gossack-Keenan, and M. D. Pell, “To believe or not to believe? How voice and accent information in speech alter listener impressions of trust,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 55–79, 2020. doi: 10.1177/1747021819865833
J. Kaur, A. Singh, and V. Kadyan, “Automatic speech recognition system for tonal languages: State-of-the-art survey,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1039–1068, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s11831-020-09414-4
J. Plante-Hébert, V. Boucher, and B. Jemel, “The processing of intimately familiar and unfamiliar voices: Specific neural responses of speaker recognition and identification,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 4, p. e0250214, 2021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250214
E. Jacewicz, and R. A. Fox, “The effects of cross-generational and cross-dialectal variation on vowel identification and classification,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 1413–1433, 2012. doi:10.1121/1.3676603
Y. Park et al., “Categorization in the perception of breathy voice quality and its relation to voice production in healthy speakers,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 3655–3666, 2019. doi:10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-19-0048
V. Iliadou et al., “Bi-syllabic, Modern Greek word lists for use in word recognition tests,” Int. J. Audio., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 74–82, 2006. doi: 10.1080/14992020500376529
S. P. Yadav, S. Zaidi, A. Mishra, and V. Yadav, “Survey on machine learning in speech emotion recognition and vision systems using a recurrent neural network (RNN),” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1753–1770, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s11831-021-09647-x
M. K. Singh et al., “Improving Speech Quality Using Deep Neural Network-Based Manipulation of Cepstral Excitation,” in Recent Developments in Electronics and Communication Systems, IOS Press, pp. 340–346, 2023. doi: 10.3233/ATDE221279
K. Richardson, J. E. Sussman, E. T. Stathopoulos, and J. E. Huber, “The effect of increased vocal intensity on interarticulator timing in speakers with Parkinson's disease: A preliminary analysis,” J. Commun. Disord., vol. 52, pp. 44–64, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.09.004
O. Amir, M. Engel, E. Shabtai, and N. Amir, “Identification of children’s gender and age by listeners,” J. Voice, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 313–321, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.001
C. F. Stewart, I. Kling, and A. D’Agosto, “Modal register, vocal fry, and uptalk: Identification and perceptual judgments of inexperienced listeners,” J. Voice, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.02.028
R. Toppo, and S. Sinha, “The acoustics of gender in Indian English: Toward forensic profiling in a multilingual context,” J. Voice, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.07.030

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Software Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Mahesh K. Singh ^*
0009-0006-5036-6037
India

Sanjeev Kumar
0000-0001-7997-0111
India

Rajeev Ranjan
0000-0003-2359-4879
India

Early Pub Date

March 30, 2026

Publication Date

March 30, 2026

Submission Date

July 30, 2025

Acceptance Date

November 19, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis...1754132

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA25GW87KP

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Singh, M. K., Kumar, S., & Ranjan, R. (2026). Global Trends in Speaker Identification Under Voice Disguise: A 25-Year Review. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 9(1), 243-261. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis...1754132

AMA

1.Singh MK, Kumar S, Ranjan R. Global Trends in Speaker Identification Under Voice Disguise: A 25-Year Review. SAUCIS. 2026;9(1):243-261. doi:10.35377/saucis.1754132

Chicago

Singh, Mahesh K., Sanjeev Kumar, and Rajeev Ranjan. 2026. “Global Trends in Speaker Identification Under Voice Disguise: A 25-Year Review”. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 9 (1): 243-61. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis. 1754132.

EndNote

Singh MK, Kumar S, Ranjan R (March 1, 2026) Global Trends in Speaker Identification Under Voice Disguise: A 25-Year Review. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 9 1 243–261.

IEEE

[1]M. K. Singh, S. Kumar, and R. Ranjan, “Global Trends in Speaker Identification Under Voice Disguise: A 25-Year Review”, SAUCIS, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 243–261, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.35377/saucis...1754132.

ISNAD

Singh, Mahesh K. - Kumar, Sanjeev - Ranjan, Rajeev. “Global Trends in Speaker Identification Under Voice Disguise: A 25-Year Review”. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 9/1 (March 1, 2026): 243-261. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis. 1754132.

JAMA

1.Singh MK, Kumar S, Ranjan R. Global Trends in Speaker Identification Under Voice Disguise: A 25-Year Review. SAUCIS. 2026;9:243–261.

MLA

Singh, Mahesh K., et al. “Global Trends in Speaker Identification Under Voice Disguise: A 25-Year Review”. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, Mar. 2026, pp. 243-61, doi:10.35377/saucis. 1754132.

Vancouver

1.Mahesh K. Singh, Sanjeev Kumar, Rajeev Ranjan. Global Trends in Speaker Identification Under Voice Disguise: A 25-Year Review. SAUCIS. 2026 Mar. 1;9(1):243-61. doi:10.35377/saucis. 1754132