Hafif Sıklet Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırması

Ünal Çavuşoğlu; Hussein Al-sanabani

doi:10.35377/saucis.02.03.648493

TR EN

Hafif Sıklet Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırması

Öz

Son yıllarda özellikle internetin hayatımızın her alanına girmesi ve nesnelerin interneti (IoT) platformundaki gelişmeler ile birlikte güvenlik daha kritik bir duruma gelmiştir. Bu platformlarda kullanılacak olan güvenlik algoritma tasarımları üzerinde çalışmalar günden güne artış göstermektedir. Bu algoritmaların güvenli bir şekilde kullanılabilmesi için yeterli güvenlik seviyelerine sahip olmaları gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada, hafif sıklet kriptoloji algoritmalarının performans ve güvenlik analizlerini gerçekleştirmek için farklı resim dosyaları üzerinde şifreleme işlemleri yapılmıştır. Güvenlik ve performans analizlerinde şifreleme işlemlerine ait histogram, korelasyon, NPCR (Number of Pixels Change Rate) ve UACI (Unified Average Changing Intensity), entropi, şifreleme kalite ve zaman analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar kullanılarak algoritmaların güvenlik ve performans seviyeleri hakkında değerlendirme sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hafif sıklet şifreleme algoritmaları,resim şifreleme,performans karşılaştırması

References

[1] C. Min et al. "Body area networks: A survey." Mobile networks and applications, vol. 16, no.2, pp. 171-193, 2011.
[2] Z. G. He, C. C.Y. Poon, and Y. T. Zhang. "A review on body area networks security for healthcare." ISRN Communications and Networking, 2011.
[3] B. Soumi and A. Patil. "ECC Based Encryption Algorithm for Lightweight Cryptography." International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. Springer, Cham, 2018.
[4] R. Carsten, et al. "Ultra-lightweight implementations for smart devices–security for 1000 gate equivalents." International Conference on Smart Card Research and Advanced Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.
[5] H. M. Asif et al. "Speeding Up the Internet of Things: LEAIoT: A Lightweight Encryption Algorithm Toward Low-Latency Communication for the Internet of Things." IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, vol7, no.6, pp. 31-37, 2018.
[6] M. Khan et al. "Secure surveillance framework for IoT systems using probabilistic image encryption." IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol14, no.8, pp.3679-3689,2018.
[7] K. Masanobu and S. Moriai. "Lightweight cryptography for the internet of things." Sony Corporation, pp.7-10, 2008.
[8] S. Ankit and M. Engineer. "A survey of lightweight cryptographic algorithms for iot-based applications." Smart Innovations in Communication and Computational Sciences. Springer, Singapore, pp.283-293, 2019.

[9] S. Vijay, A.Vithalkar, and M. Hashmi. "Lightweight security protocol for chipless RFID in Internet of Things (IoT) applications." 2018 10th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS). IEEE, 2018.
[10] W. Yawen and Y. Guan. "Lightweight location verification algorithms for wireless sensor networks." IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems,vol. 24, no.5, pp.938-950, 2012.
[11] K. Shankar and M. Elhoseny. "Multiple Share Creation with Optimal Hash Function for Image Security in WSN Aid of OGWO." Secure Image Transmission in Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) Applications. Springer, Cham, pp.131-146, 2019.
[12] M. Vandana, Y. Singh, and R. Bhatt. "A Review on Lightweight Node Authentication Algorithms in Wireless Sensor Networks." 2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC). IEEE, 2018.
[13] J. Daemen and V. Rijmen. "AES proposal: Rijndael.", 1999.
[14] A. M. Mohammad, F. Schaefer, and S. Wedig. "A simplified AES algorithm and its linear and differential cryptanalyses." Cryptologia, vol. 27,no.2, pp.148-177, 2003.
[15] Standard, Data Encryption. "Federal information processing standards publication 46." National Bureau of Standards, US Department of Commerce, vol. 23, 1977.
[16] A. Ross and M. Kuhn. "Low cost attacks on tamper resistant devices." International Workshop on Security Protocols. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997.
[17] H. Deukjo et al. "HIGHT: A new block cipher suitable for low-resource device." International Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.
[18] B. Eli, O. Dunkelman, and N. Keller. "A related-key rectangle attack on the full KASUMI." International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005.
[19] W. Wenling and L. Zhang. "LBlock: a lightweight block cipher." International Conference on Applied Cryptography and Network Security. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.
[20] G. Zheng, S. Nikova, and Y. Wei Law. "KLEIN: a new family of lightweight block ciphers." International Workshop on Radio Frequency Identification: Security and Privacy Issues. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.
[21] B. Andrey et al. "PRESENT: An ultra-lightweight block cipher." International workshop on cryptographic hardware and embedded systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007.
[22] L. Rivest, Ronald, et al. "RC6 as the AES." AES Candidate Conference, 2000.
[23] D. Canniere, O. Dunkelman, and M. Knežević. "KATAN and KTANTAN—a family of small and efficient hardware-oriented block ciphers." International Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009.
[24] Y. Liu, D. Gu, Z. Liu, and W. Li, “Impossible Differential Attacks on Reduced-Round LBlock”, In ISPEC 2012, pp. 97-108, 2012.
[25] L. Wen, M. Wang, and J. Zhao,“Related-Key Impossible Diferential Attack on Reduced-Round LBlock”, J. Comput. Sci. Technol., vol.29,no.1, pp.165-176, 2014.
[26] G. Wadday, M. Ahmed Salim and Hayder J. Mohammed Ali A. Abdullah. "Study of WiMAX Based Communication Channel Effects on the Ciphered Image Using MAES Algorithm." International Journal of Applied Engineering Research,vol.13, no.8, pp.6009-6018, 2018.
[27] A. Forouzan, Behrouz, “Cryptography & network security”, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 2007.
[28] J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
[29] N. K. Pareek, V. Patidar, K. K.Sud, “Image encryption using chaotic logistic map”, Image and Vision Computing, vol.24, no.9, pp. 926–934, 2006.
[30 ] E. Biham, A. Shamir, “Differential cryptanalysis of DES-like cryptosystems”, Journal of Cryptology, vol.4, no.1, pp. 3–72, 1991.
[31] Y. Wang, K. Wong, X. Liao,T. Xiang,G. Chen, “A chaos-based image encryption algorithm with variable control parameters”, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol.41,no.4, pp.1773–1783, 2009.
[32] CE. Shannon, “Communication theory of secrecy system”, Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol.28, pp. 656–715, 1949.
[33] A. Jolfaei, A. Mirghadri, “A New Approach to Measure Quality of Image Encryption”, International Journal of Computer and Network Security, vol. 2,no. 8, pp. 38–43, 2010.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Computer Software

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ünal Çavuşoğlu ^*
0000-0002-5794-6919
Türkiye

Hussein Al-sanabani
Andorra

Publication Date

December 31, 2019

Submission Date

November 19, 2019

Acceptance Date

December 23, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 2 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis.02.03.648493

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA27DK62AT

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Çavuşoğlu, Ü., & Al-sanabani, H. (2019). Hafif Sıklet Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırması. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 2(3), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis.02.03.648493

AMA

1.Çavuşoğlu Ü, Al-sanabani H. Hafif Sıklet Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırması. SAUCIS. 2019;2(3):158-169. doi:10.35377/saucis.02.03.648493

Chicago

Çavuşoğlu, Ünal, and Hussein Al-sanabani. 2019. “Hafif Sıklet Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırması”. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 2 (3): 158-69. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis.02.03.648493.

EndNote

Çavuşoğlu Ü, Al-sanabani H (December 1, 2019) Hafif Sıklet Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırması. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 2 3 158–169.

IEEE

[1]Ü. Çavuşoğlu and H. Al-sanabani, “Hafif Sıklet Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırması”, SAUCIS, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 158–169, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.35377/saucis.02.03.648493.

ISNAD

Çavuşoğlu, Ünal - Al-sanabani, Hussein. “Hafif Sıklet Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırması”. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 2/3 (December 1, 2019): 158-169. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis.02.03.648493.

JAMA

1.Çavuşoğlu Ü, Al-sanabani H. Hafif Sıklet Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırması. SAUCIS. 2019;2:158–169.

MLA

Çavuşoğlu, Ünal, and Hussein Al-sanabani. “Hafif Sıklet Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırması”. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 2, no. 3, Dec. 2019, pp. 158-69, doi:10.35377/saucis.02.03.648493.

Vancouver

1.Ünal Çavuşoğlu, Hussein Al-sanabani. Hafif Sıklet Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırması. SAUCIS. 2019 Dec. 1;2(3):158-69. doi:10.35377/saucis.02.03.648493

The Performance Comparison of Lightweight Encryption Algorithms

Hafif Sıklet Şifreleme Algoritmalarının Performans Karşılaştırması

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

The Performance Comparison of Lightweight Encryption Algorithms

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Performance Analysis of Chaotic Neural Network and Chaotic Cat Map Based Image Encryption

Impacts of cost leadership, service innovation, customer value creation on business performance during the Covid-19 Era

Cryptographic Algorithm Grafted onto the ESP-NOW Protocol for Security Optimization in Wireless Sensor Network Chains

A New Hybrid Image Encryption Model Based on Custom Logic Functions and Dynamic Chaotic Keys