Articles can be submitted to the SAUCIS by registering in the "Article Management System" on  web site [click].

Articles sent by e-mail will not be taken into consideration.

The journal's compliance with the writing rules is examined, and a similarity check is made to prevent plagiarism. Similarity software is used in the checking process. The overall similarity rate should be less than 20%, If the similarity rate is more than 20%, the study is either rejected or sent back to the author to reduce the similarity rate. The pre-review is completed within a maximum of 7 days. 

After the study passes the stages of pre-review and similarity checking, it is reviewed by the relevant editor/associated editor in terms of subject, scope, language use, and academic competence. This review is completed within a maximum of 30 days.

Studies that pass the pre-review and editorial review undergo a confidential double-blind peer review process. Within the double-blind strategy, the identity of the peer reviewer is concealed from the author submitting publications to the journal. Similarly, the peer reviewers do not know who wrote the article they are reviewing. In other words, the peer review process is conducted by keeping both authors and peer reviewers anonymous to each other. Articles are sent to at least two referees for evaluation. (Click for the Article Evaluation Form.) The reports are also stored in the Article Management System.  

Authors take into account the feedback, criticisms, and recommendations of the reviewer and the Editorial Board. In case of any disagreement, they have the right to appeal with their justifications. Authors edit the article as per the reports and upload the final version of the article to the system.

The editors checks whether the author has made the requested corrections in the text. If there is a “Major Revision” requirement in the peer review reports, they send the article to the relevant peer reviewer. If there is an "Acceptance" or "Minor Revision" requirement and the revisions are completed, they can submit the article for language checks (The checking process is completed within a maximum of 7 days.). If they detect that the corrections have not been made, they re-send the article to the author. They may reject the article if the author does not make the corrections again. Articles that are not accepted for publication are not deleted from the system. Their processes and files are stored in the system.

The articles that pass technical, academic, and linguistic reviews are examined by the Editorial Board, and the final publication status is determined. In case of any objection from the members, the Board decides by a majority of votes. 

Studies that pass the language control are reviewed by the English Language Editor, and if necessary, corrections are requested from the author. The checking process is completed within a maximum of 15 days.

The journal undertakes the typesetting and layout processes of the studies decided to be published by the Editorial Board.